What Is The Difference Between Clean And Dirty Food
Thread: The only difference between a "Clean" and "DIRTY" food is...
-
09-26-2008, 12:46 AM #1
Misc. OTO-HNS consult
The merely deviation betwixt a "Make clean" and "DIRTY" nutrient is...
How much of information technology yous eat.
-
-
09-26-2008, 12:49 AM #two
usmc
Not exactly. More similar how processed it is.
Caleb Donnelly
I wrote this.
-Teamwork is adept,
you can arraign someone else
-
09-26-2008, 12:53 AM #3
Misc. OTO-HNS consult
Please re-read post #i.Originally Posted by Caleb
Not exactly. More than like how processed information technology is.
-
09-26-2008, 12:57 AM #4
usmc
Sure affair. Whatsoever floats your boat human.Originally Posted by Mr. Horse
Caleb Donnelly
I wrote this.
-Teamwork is practiced,
you can arraign someone else
-
09-26-2008, 12:57 AM #v
Whallet
food density is what i go by...just i encounter your signal
IG = @ Bmur18 - Follow me and message for reps
**BMBC...MANG!**
rep back 10k+
-
09-26-2008, 12:59 AM #vi
Registered User
well no crap, eating 1 large mac a day won't make y'all fat if you don't become by x (Ten existence your BMR + workout etc.)
But instead of a big mac yous could eat 100 stems of celery, 10 pounds of broccoli, and bunch of other healthy crap. In the cease, the more calories vs calories in works and wins. You tin become fatty off cottage cheese =)
Last edited by Alexinator; 09-26-2008 at 01:00 AM. Reason: typo
-
09-26-2008, 01:02 AM #vii
usmc
Some clean foods are very dumbo, such as almonds. "clean" foods will be clean regardless of how much you eat of them. That'due south not to say it's fine to eat all of them y'all want... but there is a definite difference between 400 calories of lean steak and 400 calories of cupcake frosting.Originally Posted by lax28
nutrient density is what i become past...but i see your indicate
Caleb Donnelly
I wrote this.
-Teamwork is good,
you can blame someone else
-
09-26-2008, 01:09 AM #8
You sir, are wrong and right at the aforementioned time.Originally Posted by Caleb
Not exactly. More similar how candy it is.
"The globe will wait up and shout salvage usa... And I'll whisper, no."
Leonidas300, SCDiesel23, Jkeith are my heroes.
-
09-26-2008, 01:11 AM #9
usmc
Very ninja similar of me, I knowOriginally Posted past -Aaron-
Y'all sir, are incorrect and right at the same time.
Caleb Donnelly
I wrote this.
-Teamwork is good,
you can blame someone else
-
09-26-2008, 01:12 AM #10
Wrong in that information technology will effect body composition.Originally Posted past Caleb
Very ninja like of me, I know
Right in the upshot that well-nigh are a byproduct of processing.
"The world will look up and shout relieve us... And I'll whisper, no."
Leonidas300, SCDiesel23, Jkeith are my heroes.
-
09-26-2008, 01:13 AM #11
muscleandscience.com
it'south irrellevant really. what are y'all going to practice swallow one seize with teeth of a big mac versus 4 egg whites and a slice of whole grain toast?
Recip's Fierce Crew!!!!
Paul De Mayo
06*02*2005bdiesel@Safe-postal service.net
-
09-26-2008, 01:22 AM #12
usmc
I hope that you are not saying what I think you're saying. Nutrient from dissimilar sources reacts differently in the torso. Clean foods and "dingy" foods volition well-nigh certainly have a different touch on body comp.Originally Posted by -Aaron-
Wrong in that it will effect body composition.
Right in the effect that most are a byproduct of processing.
Caleb Donnelly
I wrote this.
-Teamwork is expert,
you can blame someone else
-
09-26-2008, 03:47 AM #13
Let's talk virtually a caloric surplus, the subject you know naught about plain.Originally Posted by Caleb
I promise that you are not saying what I call up you're saying. Food from different sources reacts differently in the body. Clean foods and "dirty" foods volition about certainly have a unlike impact on body comp.
Prove to me that you will gain fat "differently" with a food deemed "unhealthy" vs. a food deemed "healthy" if both puts the user in the same caloric surplus.
This of course is if the required amount of poly peptide, efa's, and vitamins in ones diet are met.
You lot can't bear witness it to me, because it's just not true.
"The earth will look upwardly and shout save the states... And I'll whisper, no."
Leonidas300, SCDiesel23, Jkeith are my heroes.
-
09-26-2008, 04:00 AM #14
Registered User
I've never got my head around this either. Autonomously from things like vitamins, if you ate say a bigmac a twenty-four hour period vs toast + cottage cheese a day, with the exact same corporeality of carbs/protein/fats - is there a difference? I keep hearing this "information technology effects your body composition" thrown around without any facts to dorsum it upwards. Does it come up down to things similar absorption and digestion rate and the corporeality of useful poly peptide your torso can absorb?
e.g. does your body more than finer use a 5lb steak every bit a source of protein than a candy beefburger? I accept no knowledge of how the body works but in my mind a beefburger would be more effectively utilised every bit its ground = bigger surface expanse!
-
09-26-2008, 04:59 AM #fifteen
Registered User
Good point. I can now say a BigMac is 100% clean for me. Same with fries. I tin continue eating as much of that stuff every bit I want, yipee!Originally Posted by Mr. Horse
On the other hand it would mean fruit might be 'muddied' on occasion. Booo!
-
09-26-2008, 05:05 AM #16
as well late, no friends
Mr Equus caballus - Look what have you done!
And you lot knew it would happen too!
"I'm too boozer to taste this craven" -Colonel Sanders
-
09-26-2008, 05:12 AM #17
I thought this was a bb forum...non a lets swallow some **** nutrient and who cares crusade my portion is smaller bull****.
-
09-26-2008, 05:14 AM #18
too late, no friends
Delight enlighten us on "proper bodybuilding diet", Dr Scientist.Originally Posted past Paumen
I thought this was a bb forum...not a lets eat some **** nutrient and who cares cause my portion is smaller bull****.
"I'm too drunk to taste this craven" -Colonel Sanders
-
09-26-2008, 05:24 AM #19
Registered User
Well make clean foods help keep your heart healthy, then a skillful portion of rice and craven breast will always win over a big mac and chips which equate to the aforementioned cals....
You can't purchase experience.
-
09-26-2008, 05:31 AM #20
Registered User
Err, NO. Deplorable. Peradventure one day.Originally Posted by Paumen
I thought this was a bb forum...
-
09-26-2008, 05:37 AM #21
I love my power hour
lolOriginally Posted by Jules Verne
Err, NO. Sorry. Perhaps i twenty-four hour period.
Donkeyno9: Don't think yous're the only 1 here who suffers from addiction, depression and failure. Winner is an attitude non a body blazon. Use your inner demons to gain an fe fist on the forces in life that agree you downwardly. Step into the furnace of reality and walk out a hard ass female parent fu....
-
09-26-2008, 06:20 AM #22
Come at me, ho
I lol'ed....all I know is I opened this thread, saw "Mr. Horse" and "-Aaron-" and knew it was gonna get well from thereOriginally Posted by Jules Verne
Err, NO. Sorry. Peradventure ane day.
Boxing Promoter, keystonebox.com
IG/Twitter/Snap: lorinelise8 (stalk away)
-
09-26-2008, 06:52 AM #23
Registered User
while i hold on this basis, i feel food quality should non be solely measured by it's result on body composition - there are many indicators of good healthOriginally Posted past -Aaron-
Permit'southward talk about a caloric surplus, the discipline you know nil nigh apparently.
Prove to me that you volition gain fat "differently" with a nutrient deemed "unhealthy" vs. a food deemed "salubrious" if both puts the user in the same caloric surplus.
This of course is if the required amount of poly peptide, efa'due south, and vitamins in ones diet are met.
You can't prove it to me, considering it'due south just not true.
I moment with God gives me far more strength than whatever expert mean solar day of lifting.
-
09-26-2008, 07:09 AM #24
TIMMY!!!!
What no one washes their food beore they eat it? Wow I e'er eat clean nutrient.
-
09-26-2008, 07:28 AM #25
Registered User
Micronutrients don't matter any more?
I'd similar to see a dingy diet matched with a clean diet by calorie and then evidence me that there is no divergence in micronutrients and probably fiber.
-
09-26-2008, 08:25 AM #26
Lifting Heavy!!!
Originally Posted by TulsaCoker
What no one washes their food beore they consume it? Wow I e'er eat make clean food.
It is probably clean as well if the plastic wrapping isnt torn or annihilation You focus your mind to train your body, and the changes that begin to take place bear on your mind as well. Dream information technology, believe information technology, and you lot volition achieve information technology. ~Arnold Schwarzenegger, The New Encyclopedia of Mod Bodybuilding, 1998
Music is holy, Fine art is sacred, and Creativity is ability
Vote for me! Vitrix Model Search-Vote Here!!: http://world wide web.vitrixmodelteam.com/index.php?option=com_modelsearch&controller=contestant&userid=233&filter_contest=fourteen&Itemid=142#photoid=1938
-
09-26-2008, 08:27 AM #27
Misc. OTO-HNS consult
Some people have a reading comprehension problem.
I didn't say anything virtually a "clean Nutrition".
I am talking well-nigh "clean FOODS".
Concluding edited by Mr. Horse; 09-26-2008 at 01:57 PM.
No sir, I don't like it.
-
09-26-2008, 08:39 AM #28
Goldfinger
I'k really dislocated here. I thought the macronutrient composition of the food we eat has a specific issue on our endocrine organization. Isn't it as well true that more calories are used to metabolize poly peptide than carbs? If this is true, then I can't see the effect of a 100 calorie surplus of protein being equal to that of a 100 calorie surplus of carbs. I retrieve the point you are trying to make is that a calorie surplus will make you gain fat regardless, but I think the effect is not equal. AdviseOriginally Posted by -Aaron-
Permit's talk most a caloric surplus, the subject field you know nothing well-nigh plain.
Testify to me that y'all will gain fat "differently" with a food accounted "unhealthy" vs. a nutrient deemed "salubrious" if both puts the user in the aforementioned caloric surplus.
This of course is if the required amount of protein, efa'due south, and vitamins in ones nutrition are met.
Y'all tin't prove information technology to me, because information technology's simply not true.
"At the cost of being repetitive, I have to one time once more state my amazement at the attribute of human nature that allows us to mix the about rigorous skepticism and the most acute gullibility"
"Equally drowned worshippers do not write histories of their experiences (information technology is better to exist live for that), so information technology is with the losers in history, whether people or ideas"
"Secular balderdash markets are designed to take the least amount of people forth for the ride every bit possible, call it universal law."
-
09-26-2008, 08:48 AM #29
Registered User
"bad foods" will about probable affect diverse hormonal responses of your organism in many different ways. higher Glycemic index, insulin spikes, trans fat will all bear on your health sooner or afterwards and make you less energetic, thus less agile with less calories burnt. Likewise deficiencies in vitamins, cobweb and minerals might also affect your metabolism and your power to maintain LBM. I might concur that for some people, those things could be somehow "forgiven" only in the long run, time volition accept its toll.Originally Posted by -Aaron-
Let's talk about a caloric surplus, the subject yous know nothing virtually apparently.
Evidence to me that yous will gain fatty "differently" with a nutrient deemed "unhealthy" vs. a food accounted "healthy" if both puts the user in the same caloric surplus.
This of course is if the required amount of protein, efa'due south, and vitamins in ones nutrition are met.
Yous can't prove it to me, because it'south simply not true.
Nutrition interferes with our genes and the way they are expressed, so eating what we are supposed to eat is much more than just a calorie in-calorie out event.
-
09-26-2008, 08:50 AM #30
I understood it, read it thoroughly, and followed information technology with a decisive answer.Originally Posted by Mr. Horse
Some people either accept a reading comprehension problem.
I didn't say anything nigh a "clean DIET".
I am talking about "clean FOODS".
"The world will look up and shout save us... And I'll whisper, no."
Leonidas300, SCDiesel23, Jkeith are my heroes.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- Yous may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
- BB code is On
- Smilies are On
- [IMG] code is On
- HTML lawmaking is Off
Forum Rules
Source: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=110846041
Posted by: colemanrefearintly.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Is The Difference Between Clean And Dirty Food"
Post a Comment